Data

Acceptance Rates

The acceptance rate of Electronic Markets (calculated on the basis of manuscripts received) varies from issue to issue as wellas between general research and special issue articles. Overall acceptance rates in recent years were:

2022: 11.9 percent
2021: 11.4 percent
2020: 13.3 percent
2019: 19.1 percent
2018: 13.2 percent
2017: 12.1 percent
2016: 15.0 percent
2015: 16.0 percent
2014: 11.8 percent
2013: 11.9 percent
2012: 11.2 percent
2011: 13.0 percent
2010: 19.5 percent
2009: 28.5 percent  
2008: 25.5 percent

Cycle Times

Being aware that a timely response to their submission is of great importance to authors, all new submissions are subject to an initial desk reject screening by the Editorial Team (Editor-in-Chief and Co-Editors) to determine whether the manuscript's topic fits within the journal's scope and the manuscript meets the journal's quality requirements with regard to rigor and relevance.

If the paper does not pass this initial screening, a first decision can usually be communicated within two weeks of submission. In case the manuscript passes the initial screening, the paper will enter the review process. To assure high quality reviews that produce valuable comments for authors, the full review process may take up to three months from initially receiving the manuscript to the first editorial decision. The average time from submission to first decision is below 60 days.

Publishing Data

ISSN (Printed ed.): 1019-6781         
ISSN (Electr. ed.): 1422-8890

Circulation  
Printed: quarterly issues (1991 until 2022)                       
Online: continuous article publishing (from 2023)

Publisher
Electronic Markets is published by Springer since Vol 19 (2009).
Up to Vol. 18 (2008) EM was published by Taylor & Francis.

Copyright
© 1991-2023 by Electronic Markets - The International Journal on Networked Business

Partial or total reproduction will be permitted upon application subject to the source being acknowledged and two copies sent to the Editorial Office.

Remarks:
Articles from the contributors do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editors.